THE WAR ON THE WORKING CLASS III

This from Sam Ashworth-Hayes is difficult to read. But you should read it, and see what a sick society we have become under a corrupt establishment and a decadent and degenerate dominant class.

 

"Failures occurred across every service. Laura Wilson’s sister Sarah was raped in a school playground aged 11. She was so young she “had no understanding of sex” when the attack occurred. The incident was the beginning of “her systematic grooming and sexual assault”, which saw her “driven across the country to be raped by multiple men in one night, and ignored by both the police and social services”.

At one point, her mother showed her phone to officers. It contained 177 numbers for adult Asian men. The police “claimed that the Data Protection Act prevented them from investigating”, and that her daughter’s behaviour was a “lifestyle choice”.

When Sarah reported an attack, the officer she spoke to “laughed and refused to investigate”."

 

Sam-Ashworth-Hayes, The true horror of the Rotherham grooming scandal – and the shameful failure to stop it. It’s hard to fathom how so many young girls could be abused for so long without the authorities intervening, The Telegraph, 13th January 2025.

 

This goes so far beyond incompetence or even cowardice. It is collusion.

These officers, social workers, Councillors and so many others were actively complicit in the most awful crimes.

Why have they not been individually held to account?

Why are the police still telling victims to shut up, still knocking on the doors of people tweeting about it, still looking the other way?

Why are so many people in power today so utterly unbothered by any of this?

(Zac Goldsmith)

 

In 2014, a brave girl on Question Time tells the BBC the rape gangs are getting away with it because the police fear being called racist.

 

The audience jeer and scoff.

The panel member patronises her and changes the subject completely.

After an intervention by the presenter, the first panelist shuts the child down by mocking her comments then saying, "we need an adult debate on this issue".

The presenter shuts her down.

You can see how this continued for so long.

 

A few edgy Tweets from Elon Musk & the "progressive" deep state's surveillance apparatus kicks in & their media lackeys who deliberately ignored decades of gangs of anti-white child rapists suddenly discover a capacity for outrage.

It is interesting to see the love that Elon Musk and Donald Trump have for the UK, and their compassion for our working class, a compassion that is singularly lacking in the other classes in this country. It’s an indictment of the dominant classes. They loath Musk and Trump every bit as much as they loathe the working class. Ancestry, origins, and roots matter. That’s the claim, based on Musk’s statement with regard to his English working class grandmother, born in Liverpool.

 

David Starkey refers to the Elon Musk’s ‘extraordinary intervention into British politics,’ asking why the richest man in is so interested in Britain and, perhaps more particularly, to England. Answers to the question have tended to proceed in a reductive biographical manner, emphasising Musk’s material self-interest in protecting Twitter or X against regulation or worse or in winning market share and making money. His critics refer to the anti-democratic control of government by billionaires, conveniently forgetting that billionaires are like Bill Gates and George Soros have been interfering in government for a long time, and that Keir Starmer has recently said the quiet bit out loud when associating his government with Blackrock. The concern to protect democracy against big money is hogwash. Few – and I can’t remember any – expressed a concern with the 83 billionaires backing Kamala Harris and the Democrats (nor did they when Obama raised far more money than McCain). Starkey doesn’t think that kind of personal reductionism explains Musk’s intervention, but does think that others may play a role in Musk’s transition from ‘a fairly middle of the road Democrat leftish Californian position to where he stands now at … the right hand of Trump. Starkey refers to the history of Musk’s older children, I would go back much further to Musk’s English working class grandmother. Starkey describes Musk as a ‘very passionate man’ with ‘extraordinary seething passions’ and a ‘burning sense of doing something,’ engaging in ‘fresh thinking,’ giving the sense of someone ‘wakening up in the middle of the night, sleeping very little with a head buzzing with ideas.’ There is also something ‘more sentimental’ in the way he ‘talks frequently of the fact that although he's South African born he is English South African not Afrikaans. His great sentimental anchor to England is his English grandmother, born in Liverpool, and she is called Cora Amelia Robinson and she marries his grandfather William Musk in England at the end of the Second World War and makes a living by cleaning houses cleaning houses. Musk talks about her with great feeling and there is that sense of a kind of continuity, a genealogical and family continuity with England. There is a sense of ancestral identity that brings him back to England. There is a sense of belonging, however displaced.

“My British grandmother, Cora Amelia Robinson, was an important part of my childhood. She was very strict, but also kind and I could always count on her.

She grew up very poor in England during the Great Depression only to be bombed in WW2. To earn money for food, she cleaned houses, leaving me with a lasting respect for those who do so. My Nana was one of the poor working-class girls with no-one to protect her who might have been abducted in present day Britain.” (Elon Musk).

 

Human beings aren't just interchangeable atomised GDP-generating economic nodes on an economist's chart.

There is, however, something that goes beyond the personal, something that is fundamentally intellectual and political. The clue, as ever came from Twitter, the new public square where the oiks are free to speak. The post came from a man called William Wolf, and who is an ex DC Washington staffer and who has a rather political view of Christianity, of Baptist Christianity with a political overtone. He began in the UK, the birthplace of Magna Carta, English common law, and the Cradle nation of the USA. He wrote this trust and directed it at Musk himself: ‘I don’t think the normies are getting this yet. In the UK, the birthplace of Magna Carta, English common law, and the law, and the cradle nation of the USA, if you are a White English born citizen you'll be sent to jail for posting unapproved opinions on social media. But if you're Pakistani and rape young girls, the authorities will help cover it up.’ Musk responded and the Tweet got millions and millions of views. Musk responded, true it hasn't quite sunk in yet, but it will.’

This expresses a view of Britain and a view of the USA. If the USA has just about managed to remain true to its identity, Britain has betrayed its own, opines Starkey. There are two very different views of the American Revolution, argues Starkey, one is that it represents the foundation of the state on new principles, the idea of Human Rights, the ideas espoused by uh Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, which talks about the human rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That view of rights, based on the singularity of the individual, has been developed at length in recent times. But there is a very different view of what happened in the USA because despite all these Lockian ideas about human rights and the rights of the citizen to overthrow the government if these rights are not fulfilled, the Constitution itself which is the document that actually governs the nation, there isn't any reference to such an idea. The Constitution is a very conservative document that keeps the essential lineaments of how they were governed already. The colonies already had a representative assemblies because it imitated England. When the colonies came together at the Congress at Philadelphia to decide how they were going to be governed, they produced a structure of government that which is astonishingly like the government in Britain in the 18th century.

This brings us back to Magna Carta, the common law, and the idea of limited government and representative government. The American Revolution completely unlike the French Revolution does not change the fundamentals of that society and is therefore a successor state. With many Americans there is a sense of looking to Britain as a kind of model as something to be seen with respect, the cradle notion, the mother country, with an awareness that the foundations of the USA were laid in Britain, and these foundations refer to a known system of law, limited, representative government, and secure property rights. This, Starkey claims, laid the foundations for innovation, economic growth, and the Industrial Revolution. And this is the point that Starkey emphasises – that Musk’s intervention is driven by his concern with freedom and innovation as against regulation and the dead-hand of the regulators. I would argue that the free market capitalism and economic liberalism that Starkey is hankering for has long gone. The anti-socialist Max Weber had that same hankering, but was honest and courageous enough a scholar to realise that that liberal society had been eclipsed by a bureaucratic collectivism, for reasons located in the tendencies to the concentration and centralisation of capital Marx had analysed. Starkey thinks a restoration is possible. So, too, did Margaret Thatcher, only for her liberalisation and privatisation strategies serving to speed up the corporatisation of public life and the private economy. There are no solutions to be found in the very structural forces responsible for the bureaucratisation and corporatisation of the world. And if the last century, going back to Weber, hasn’t taught people this lesson, then the situation is hopeless. At the same time, the kind of bureaucratic regulation now being pursued well deserves Musk’s animus. My own question is this: where on Earth are the leftists and socialists in all this? That so many are pushing to advance this bureaucratic form of regulation indicates how thin their understanding of socialism is. Weber warned that Marx’s ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ would be realised as the ‘dictatorship of the officials,’ and it is clear that a political movement that now openly despises the working class takes that warning for a promise. Instead of looking to restore liberty, free trade, and property rights against the tyranny of bureaucratic regulation, I would argue that that tyranny has its roots in those liberal foundations, and that we need to move forward by innovating new democratic forms of the common life, a post-liberalism that recovers the best aspects of past freedoms and practices and realises them by raising them as a new political form.

You can see where David Starkey is coming from: he wants a restoration of the liberal order of the eighteenth century, and talks as though the evolution of the capital system this past century and more can be rolled back. That’s hopeless – the problem we face is structural, not chronological, and what we have now is the end product of that past liberal order. You may as well select another past Golden Age of your dreams and yearn for its return. It won’t resolve the crises and contradictions we face in the here and now.

In contrast to the European Union and notions of world governance based on technocracy and central control, Starkey’s view leads in the direction of an Anglosphere Union based on liberty, open markets, free trade, secure property, free contract, and the rule of law. That was the free market/free trade strategy pursued through the 1980s and 1990s, and it paved the way for the globalised corporate form.

 

We live in an ailing and failing neoliberal system, about to mutate into a technofeudalism under the corporate form. The latter has emerged out of the former. Neoliberalism itself is not quite classical liberalism, but classical liberalism reimagined in the fall of the old empires. The free trade system and liberal society was disintegrating, being supplanted by collective forms, and so there was a concerted attempt to roll out free markets worldwide.

 

American big business trusts funded it in the first instance. Terrified by communism and socialism, the successful example of the success of the state-centred US New Deal caused them to develop an alternative. That big business was behind it should tell you immediately that the liberalism of free trade and markets was an ideological cover – they knew what the socialists knew, that we had entered a post-liberal order based on collective forms. The only question was what kind of forms – socialist or corporate. The ideologues, of course, presented themselves as anti-collectivist. The term neoliberalism was coined by German sociologist and economist Alexander Rüstow at the Walter Lippmann Colloquium, a conference of intellectuals organized in Paris in August 1938 by French philosopher Louis Rougier. The term referred to the rejection of the old laissez-faire liberalism, whose social conditions had clearly passed. With the decline and fall of classical liberalism, the aim of the Colloquium was to construct a new liberalism as a rejection of collectivism, socialism, and state bureaucracy. Actually, there were two camps at the meeting: one, represented by Ludwig von Mises, Jacques Rueff, and Étienne Mantoux, advocating a strict adherence to Manchester liberalism and laissez-faire; the other, represented by Alexander Rüstow, Raymond Aron, Wilhelm Röpke, Auguste Detoeuf, Robert Marjolin, Friedrich Hayek, Louis Marlio, and Walter Lippmann, arguing for a kind of social liberalism which was more favorable to state intervention and regulation in face of market failures and externalities. Their agreed objectives were to destroy the social power of the organised working class, atomise societies into a congeries of self-seeking individuals, take over and minimise the state, and promote the market as the sole economic organising mechanism. In taking over the state in the late seventies and early eighties, the ideologues pursuing these ideas actually extended the state and facilitating the colonisation of private and public life by the corporate form. But they did indeed succeed in securing their other objectives – they crushed the power of labour, destroyed the working class, unravelled social ties and bonds, made everyone depenendent on the forces of a ‘free’ market that was itself dependent on corporate power, atomised society, uprooted one and all.

 

Heavily funded by big business after World War II, they pursued their goals through the Mont Pelerin Society and numerous think-tanks, eventually infiltrating politics, mass media, and the education system, targetting university economics departments. Neoliberalism'’s ‘free-market’ economics models are neither neutral, scientifici, nor rational, except in the sense of a class rationality - they are driven by a fear and loathing of the state as an agency of the common good, of society, of labour and the working class, all of which must make way for the monetarist ambitions of bankers and entrepreneurs. The idea that liberalism is to be restored is for the birds. We need a proper reckoning with the nature of the society we are in. And extensive public spaces constituted by democratic social forms to be abreast of the collective forces of the age. That’s the alternative to the corporate techno-bureaucratic feudalism that is upon us. Or you can carry on sleepwalking in hope of external saviours. The kind of sleepwalking that has brought us to this.

Statement from Blue Labour:

 

Our view is that whipping MPs into voting against a national inquiry is a mistake that we will come to regret.

This story is not going anywhere. The dam has broken — at long last.

In the same way that the post office inquiry shed light on injustices and gave voice to their victims, a national inquiry would give the worst series of atrocities in modern British history - and the failures at every level of the state that enabled them - their due.

We still do not have answers to the most basic questions about this horror, including the number of victims, the identities of all the perpetrators, and the names of those in positions of power and authority who are responsible for covering up or otherwise enabling this abuse.

A national inquiry would also give the victims a long overdue opportunity to be heard.

The victims and their families were working class, surrounded by people and systems that were too often dismissive, disbelieving or outright hostile to working-class people.

They were teenage girls, in a culture that found it too easy to doubt vulnerable girls’ credibility.

And they were white victims of men of mostly Pakistani origin, in an institutional culture that was terrified of being accused of racism and seemed more interested in 'managing community relations’ than robust and impartial policing.

We are still a long way from justice. A full national inquiry would be a start.

 

Not a single Labour MP voted for a national inquiry into the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs.

Cowardice. If you thought your MPs would vote your way you wouldn’t have to ‘whip’ them & threatens them with removal from the party if they ‘god forbid’ actually represented their constituents, the people who voted for them on a free vote? The people want the cover up uncovered.

We are having to suffer the same tactics of denial, deflection, and diversion – lies – in the UK again that have been practised all along, now that it has taken Elon Musk to expose the rape gang scandal that the authorities and its lickspittles have been burying for years. The working class are treated like rubbish, and if they dare protest they are labelled ‘far right.’

 

It’s Hillsborough all over again. I spent a quarter of a century demanding “Justice for the 96”, to no avail. It now looks like we are going to have to waste more decades demanding “justice for the 250,000+” It would be quicker and more effective to burn the entire establishment to the ground.

 

"The All-Party Group on Islamophobia - which leads calls for govt to officially adopt its definition of 'Islamophobia' for all public bodies - gives the game away in its own report. Almost unbelievably it says: `The recourse to the notion of free speech and a supposed right to criticise Islam results in nothing more than another subtle form of anti-Muslim racism, whereby the criticism humiliates, marginalises and stigmatises Muslims. One real-life example of this concerns the issue of "grooming gangs"." The MPs and their backers want to outlaw any criticism of these sordid activities." (Zac Goldsmith).

 

I've received a phone call from South Yorkshire Police tonight about my reporting on X.

They've asked me to delete posts and not to report on Rotherham professionals moving forward even though they're no reporting restrictions on the case.

I'd like to add, the information I've reported came directly from South Yorkshire Police over 6 months ago.

It's also been in the public domain for over 6 months.

I'd also like to add the police officer didn't really have a clue what was going on.

How long do you think it will be before the police start ringing round asking us to delete our posts that are exposing what has been happening in our country? (Sammy Woodhouse).

 

It's remarkable that South Yorkshire Police are still a thing. I remember the South Yorkshire Police from the Hillsborough Tragedy.

 

“The contempt for the working classes… My goodness. It is unforgivable.” (Katharine Birbalsingh).

 

“Are they really going to sweep the child-rape gangs – sadistic sexual torture of thousands of white girls – under the carpet? AGAIN. This is the worst scandal in British history. Other countries look on in horror and disbelief. We can’t survive as a society with this shame.” (Allison Pearson).

 

I and the other campaigners for justice said precisely the same thing with respect to the Hillsborough Tragedy and its cover up. We put the question before the British public – do you think your society is going to survive and thrive with an establishment that is corrupt to the core? Do you think you will preserve your own liberty and attain happiness by way of cowardice? It seems that society hasn’t survived.

 

The Labour government votes 364-111 against holding a national enquiry, claiming that there have already been enquires. It was precisely the same response that Hillsborough campaigners for justice received when calling for a new enquiry, knowing that the previous ones had been hobbled and nobbled to give the appearance of investigation whilst keeping all the issues at stake covered up.

 

‘They [the victims] have already had seven public inquiries!’ Peter Kyle MP defends the Labour his party's decision to resist a public inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal. The Hillsborough campaigners were told this, too, with added abuse. We knew that the truth was being hidden and justice denied by these hobbled enquiries.

 

An enquiry set up to investigate institutional failing – IICSA – only heard from members of the institutions, they didn’t hear from the victims. The enquiry had a massive budget of £200 million. Only two victims were heard directly. Maggie Oliver states that she had numerous victims who wanted to speak to the enquiry, only to have their voices silenced. The money was spent not for reasons of investigation, but to present the illusion of enquiry to the public. Dozens of pages of Maggie Oliver’s testimony to IICSA were redacted. Key sections were removed. Over half of it was cut. IICSA said they published all of the “relevant” parts of her statement.

 

Many Labour MPs and senior public figures are still sticking by the line that we don't need a grooming gangs inquiry because the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was sufficient. But we know that IICSA refused to investigate Britain’s most notorious sex-grooming scandals and barred key witnesses from giving evidence. It was given hundreds of millions of pounds and plenty of powers, but it totally neglected to look into the areas that already had significant reports on the abuse gangs.

 

Let's go back to 2020. IICSA held two weeks of public hearings for its "organised networks" section. The grooming gangs were included in this section.

 

We all anticipated that this strand would focus on the scandal and dive into revealing more appalling failures. By then, the crisis was well-known. There had already been successful prosecutions of predominantly Pakistani gangs in Rochdale, Rotherham, Oxford, Telford, Burnley, High Wycombe, Leicester, Dewsbury, Peterborough, Halifax and Newcastle. Many more towns would follow. There are fifty towns or more scarred by this scandal.

But where did IICSA look? St Helens, Tower Hamlets in east London, Swansea, Durham, Bristol and Warwickshire. None of the six had witnessed a major prosecution of a Pakistani abuse gangs. In all six areas, the proportion of the population that is of Pakistani origin is lower than the national average.

 

One witness, a senior copper from South Wales police, said there was "no data" to demonstrate the presence of grooming gangs in Swansea. So they chose to look into a town in Wales that literally had no data rather than ANY of the many northern towns affected by this scourge. And IICSA also elected to hear no evidence from survivors or experts who recognised pattern that had scarred so many towns.

 

If that information isn't damning enough about this so-called "inquiry" into grooming gangs, then every single MP who voted against a proper one last week should watch the public hearing for IICSA on its opening day.

 

Henrietta Hill, QC, lead counsel to the inquiry, said that IICSA had "carefully considered the extent to which, if at all, it should focus on areas such as Rochdale, Rotherham and Oxford, all of which have attracted public attention." She said that the inquiry had found it was instead "more appropriate" to focus instead on "different areas, not least because it was intended that this was a forward-looking investigation building on analysis that’s already been done."

 

This deliberate decision not to LOOK FORWARD but really to LOOK AWAY was made in 2020, with victims and campaigners arguing at the time that there was a cowardly reluctance to confront the over-representation of Pakistanis in group-based abuse.

 

Prosecutor Nazir Afzal said last week that we do not need an inquiry because "there has been an independent inquiry into child sexual abuse, the catalyst for which was so-called grooming gangs. It cost millions and the last government failed to accept much of its recommendations." But in 2020, when IICSA's approach to the grooming gangs were set out, he slammed the inquiry's conduct as "a nonsense." He said that: "With the other strands of this inquiry it’s been about looking back at what went wrong to see what we can learn from those mistakes. This section [on grooming gangs] decided it was going to look forward, but you can’t move forward without looking back at the failures."

 

Why has he changed his mind? Why are we now able to move forward without looking back at the failures?

 

Labour MP Sarah Champion MP also voted against an inquiry. She told the Observer: "I don’t want an inquiry that will kick everything into the long grass – I want action."

But what did she say in 2020 after IICSA decided to exclude evidence of sex-grooming networks in northern England? Champion: "You have to question what they are trying to achieve. It’s more than a missed opportunity. So many survivors pinned their hopes on this inquiry getting to the truth." What is she playing at? Labour whipped the vote, so maybe she went along to keep her career, to be able to raise the issue again?

 

The 364-111 vote against a national enquiry was another missed opportunity to finally look at these nationwide failures. Why has she changed her mind?

We have never had a public inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal.

 

IICSA's 'investigation' into the gangs was a sham and a cover-up.

A national enquiry would be a waste of time, some say, even having the nerve to point to Hillsborough – the biggest inquest in British history, and still no justice. I take this as a damning indictment of the establishment. In 1989 I said there would be no justice, and I was right. In 1989 I demanded a root-and-branch transformation of British society, and I was right.

 

“Trying to film some interviews in Rotherham for reaction to the vote in parliament. No one would speak to us. Pakistanis at the market claimed they didn’t know it was going on. A white man warned “anyone who puts their head above the parapet gets shot.” Just silence.” (Charlie Peters).

 

Rotherham as described by Charlie Peters here describes Northern Ireland in the middle of the Troubles – fearful locals scared out of their wits, too scared to speak out in public. This is what the political ideology of multiculturalism has brought – turning a once high trust society into a low trust society that will have to be held together by external force, if it is to be held together at all. Is that the future for the UK? ID cards and 24/7 surveillance in the digital cage, under the constant eye of those who brought the chaos upon us in the first place. It will be if you don’t speak up here and demand justice. In my Tolkien books I noted that the only thing we see of the evil Lord Sauron in ‘The Lord of the Rings’ is his eye, watching and appropriating all. Once you are in the eye of Sauron, your liberty is over. The authorities don’t give a damn about you. And the poor don’t matter at all. They are already being sacrificed to any number of luxury beliefs appropriated by the state and corporate capital.

You will have a society in which standards of truth and justice will become mere functions of power – the strongest arm and loudest voice. As I have warned umpteen times, only for liberals to carry on looking away, taking the assumptions of liberal society for granted. I warned that the myriad fundamentalisms and totalitarianism (secular and religious) would run a coach and horses through the whole flabby terrain. The day will come when the middle class liberals, constantly scorning the working class whilst warning of the rise of fascism, will be hiding under the tables crying out for the working class to come and rescue them in face of real fascism.

 

Excuse my contempt.

 

"Pakistani rape gangs will continue to target the poorest and most vulnerable of our children. The Government has just given them the green light to do so.

A man of Pakistani heritage rapes a 12-year-old while 20 of his male relatives wait their turn downstairs. Another man takes a pump to a child's anus in order to prepare it for gang rape. The girl in question had to cope with four of the monsters penetrating her body all at once.

These acts of human destruction are akin to war crimes. Because the perpetrators and their ilk are waging a war on white people and infidels, in which total degradation is the main weapon. Through children, they attack fathers, brothers, uncles. Mothers.

I'll be called Islamophobic for pointing out the obvious, but it doesn't matter. In the absence of a public inquiry, it's our duty to share the detail far and wide. There's no alternative."

(Dr Philip Kiszely).

 

DARVO manipulation strategy

D – DENY, DEFLECT, AND DIVERT

Perpetrator denies whatever wrongdoing they are accused of. The authorities and its intellectual servants deflect and divert attention.

 

A – ATTACK

Perpetrator attacks the other person by questioning their actions, character, integrity, and mental health.

 

RVO – REVERSE VICTIM AND OFFENDER

The perpetrator attempts to switch roles with the victim. Instead of accepting responsibility for these actions, they try to make the original victim into the perpetrator.

 

Labour MP Dan Carden breaks with Keir Starmer to call for an enquiry into the ‘grooming’  (rape and torture) gangs. He is right to do so: the time has come to "challenge the orthodoxy of progressive liberal multiculturalism that led to authorities failing to act."  This story is far from over. 

 

Read his full statement here: 

"The British public want action and justice on the unspeakable rape gangs. The scale of the crimes committed - rape, murder, torture - are horrific. The public compassion for the victims, thousands of young British working class girls and children is real.

The public call for justice must be heeded.

It is shocking that people in positions of power could have covered up and refused to act to avoid confronting racial or cultural issues or because victims were poor and working class. We must question and challenge the orthodoxy of progressive liberal multiculturalism that led to authorities failing to act. We need a new doctrine to take our multi-ethnic society into the future.

Both Keir Starmer and Jess Phillips have strong records in this area and yet the government has failed to take the high ground. It must communicate a clear message about whose side it is on and now direct the state to implement the rule of law without fear of favour and deliver justice.

The Prime Minister must use the full power of the state to deliver justice.  It must continue to unflinchingly pursue the perpetrators and bring to account those in positions of authority who turned a blind eye, failed to act, or gave political cover to the gangs. The outcome must include acknowledging the racial and ethnic hatred of this mass sexual violence.

This is not an obsession of the far right. I am speaking out because over the decades there have been far too few Labour voices expressing clear disgust and outrage at these heinous crimes, their cover-up and the lack of action." 

  

It’s a sunk ship, a lost cause. A handful of voices from the Left – including liberals, progressives, and greens – serves only to cast leftist complicity in sharp relief.

 

Dan Carden is the Labour MP for Liverpool Walton. I remember when the seat was held by Eric Heffer. I have a couple of books from Eric's personal library. Eric was proper Labour. This looks like an attempt to reclaim the Red Wall back from the university educated, middle class crowd. I think it is too late, Labour's record is utterly compromised. It has new class interests, and these are diametrically opposed to the working class. Another Left - the Left that is needed - will be based on close connections with the working class.

And now, a week on, and Rotherham MP Sarah Champion breaks ranks with Labour and calls for a national enquiry into ‘grooming’ gangs. People’s outrage on this has been reasoned rather than racist. The idea that past enquiries have been enough is palpable nonsense. Champion has relocated her conscience and backbone. The dam has burst. Back in 2017, Champion was forced to resign as a minister having written an article on grooming gangs. She was Secretary of State for Women. And Corbyn’s Labour forced her out. 100 cross party MPs, including Naz Shar, who told ‘those abused [raped, tortured, murdered] girls’ to ‘shut up for the sake of diversity,’ demanded her head, and they got it. On Wednesday she voted against a national enquiry. Now she has had a sudden awakening. Now she has found the nerve to break with Starmer and the Labour. She has posted a five-point plan.

 

"I’ve published my 5 point plan to ensure children are safeguarded, victims & survivors can access the support that they need, perpetrators are brought to justice & those in authority are held to account. This includes a national inquiry into grooming gangs."

 

Sarah Champion MP's five-point plan for addressing Child Sexual Exploitation & Abuse

 

Reasons: Child Sexual Exploitation/Abuse (CSE/A) is endemic in the UK and needs to be recognised as a national priority. It is clear that the public distrusts Governments and Authorities when it comes to preventing and prosecuting child abuse. The statistics on these crimes show the scale of the problem; the high level of public concern and mistrust only emphasises why addressing it must be a priority.

These recommendations to the Government are to be run concurrently, though by their nature one will feed into another. Transparency, accountability and justice need to be embedded into this process, with victims and survivors sitting at its heart.

 

1. The Government to implement the IICSA inquiry recommendations with a timetable and ring-fenced resources. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill and the forthcoming Crime and Policing Bill provide the legislative opportunity to implement about half of the recommendations. Many of the others require guidance or secondary legislation.

 

2. Are 'grooming gangs' still happening, or have cases been missed. Require all Local Authorities and Police to audit child protection referrals linked to CSE over the last ten years (post-Jay inquiry into Rotherham). This would be UK wide, and the results analysed by an independent panel. Areas would be given a series of standard 'canary' questions which would highlight any areas of concern, for example; "Detail the cases of CSE and how you responded to them." An area saying they do not have CSE would trigger an immediate inquiry.

 

3. National inquiry - locally led. Local inquiries do not have the power to compel witnesses/evidence, nor would they satisfy the public concern of cover-ups. There needs to be a national "Telford style" model which is nationally resourced, and victim centred. The hub-and-spoke inquiry would be rolled out by the Home Office to areas that trigger the threshold for greater scrutiny. Triggers would be victim and survivor reports, self-referral by Local Councils or Police, or concern raised from the independent panel. The findings from the inquiries would then be fed back to the Home Office for a national response. Of course, on-going prosecutions, risks and disciplinaries would run parallel.

 

4. New commission work into the motivations of grooming gang members. Whilst we know about the crime, we do not know about the reasons for the crime. Is it just power and opportunity, or is there something deeper we are failing to address?

 

5. Review if the law is fit for purpose to protect children and prosecute abusers. There needs to be a specific audit of legislation to make sure it is appropriate to secure convictions for child abuse. For example, The Crime and Disorder Act established a framework for local collaboration to reduce crime and enhance community safety, emphasising protective measures based on systematic analysis of crime patterns. With many areas of Licencing now falling to Local Authorities, and the Act being updated by subsequent laws, is community involvement and co-ordination still in place and able to spot grooming gangs?

This calls for more than an enquiry but wants an investigation into the motivations of the grooming gangs.

 

‘For clarity, I don’t want just another national inquiry - I want the Home Office to mandate local inquiries around the country to hold authorities to account - which then report back to Government. Victims & survivors know the problems & solutions - give them a voice.’ (Sarah Champion).

If victims and survivors already know the problems and solutions, then why do we need an inquiry. We need an investigation and root-and-branch transformation, and those who have worked to hobble inquiries in the past and block inquiries now know this.

The third point is crucial. There is an extensive public concern with cover ups. There have been too many in Britain.

 

She also calls for a commission into motivations.

 

That would appear to be the right thing, although I would question why local and national are set in antithetical relation. It’s not encouraging that it has taken this long to do what should have been done immediately. And it is rather suspicious that this 5-point plan should have emerged so quickly in the aftermath of the vote against a national inquiry. It is best never to trust a politicians - judge by deeds, not words.

Champion was sacked in 2017 for telling the truth, and politicians and the rest of the country have been burying the truth all along. They are either ideologues or cowards. Telling the truth was shut down. ‘There has been no proper academical government-led investigation or enquiry or assessment of the motivations of the grooming gangs.’ That they are white working class girls makes it easier for members of the dominant class to look away and easier for the authorities to bury the issue. They have all been caught out, bang to rights, exposed. How telling that they immediately go into denial mode, deflecting and diverting, and doubling down. These people are deceitful to the core. And they loathe the working class. They have been exposed.

 

“Victims of Pakistani Muslim paedophile rape and torture gangs are the female equivalent of cannon fodder.” Like their male counterparts parts, working class girls don’t matter. (Kellie-Jay Keen).

It’s worse than them not mattering, the left actively despises the working class.

 

Cannon fodder to political ideology covering material interests, neoliberalism in the 1980s, globalisation in the 1990s and 2000s, multiculturalism and diversity in the 2020s, and corporatisation behind it all, a corporatisation from which the ideologues and the class they represent benefit.

 

 "Cover ups in the UK are becoming a serious endemic problem. The Post Office scandal, the blood contamination scandal, & now grooming gangs. We cannot have NO investigations, protecting people who caused these scandals. British people/tax payers deserve transparency & justice." (Sharron Davies).

I noted the absence of Hillsborough from this list, despite the quarter of a century campaign for justice from Hillborough victims, families, and friends. Even now, working class people get overlooked. As a Hillsborough survivor, who spent a quarter of a century and more fighting for justice, and getting none, I would advise people to check the history of the Hillsborough Disaster of 1989 and the aftermath of lies and abuse to learn all the lessons they need to learn on the establishment and how fundamentally corrupt it is.

And reclaim your sovereign and social power and reorganise it from the base up. It’s a lesson working class people learned the hard way in the nineteenth century, then slowly but surely unlearned through reliance on bourgeois parties buttressed by a degree of material affluence.

 

In Lancastrian dialect:

“So neaw my tale is at an end but nowt but truth aw tells sirs,

If ever we want the times to mend we’ll ha’ for t’ do ‘t eaur sells sir.”

The Oldham Tinkers, The Owdham chaps visit t' th' queen.

 

Translation – if you want bad times to end, you’ll have to do it yourself.

Social organisation and social restitution are key.

 

Elon Musk has ripped the cloak of deceit off one of Britain’s most disgusting scandals. Starmer’s denunciation of Musk for ‘spreading lies and misinformation’ is an orchestra of discordant duplicity.

I pay no attention to the words 'disinformation' and 'misinformation' coming out of the mouths of the establishment and the liberal media. To them, 'disinformation' and 'misinformation' only matter with respect to the views of political opponents and the 'lower' orders. Truth and justice are no longer transcendent standards applicable to all equally, but mere functions of power and political preferences.

‘This may be hard to comprehend .. but the people of that enlightened land did not protect their daughters. I’m sorry to say they abandoned them to their fate.’ (Allison Pearson).

 

Why the surprise? There is no fate involved – working class communities, culture, and men, women, and children have been put to the sword this past half century. Deindustrialisation, mass unemployment as ‘a price worth paying’ (Margaret Thatcher), followed by demoralisation and what are called ‘deaths of despair.’ And the only time the middle class express outrage is when working class people from the ‘left behind’ communities vote to leave the EU – and the outrage is expressed by way of abuse of working class people as xenophobic, racist, stupid and every other sin under the sun.

 

"A very emotional moment at the Reform party conference today as a very brave survivor of the rape gangs explains how she was locked up in a flat and abused by gangs of Muslim men, how the police knew, and how the only man who was ever arrested during her abuse was her own father who, trying to find his daughter, called the police more than 200 times and was arrested when he tried to save her. She said she wants a national inquiry aKeit_Stai she wants the dots joined together, she doesn't think past inquiries go anywhere near far enough, she wants this to be treated as organised crime, she wants better data on the ethnicity of perpetrators and she wants action ... NOW."

(Matt Goodwin).

 

"The enormity of the rape gangs issue, known now to the world thanks to Elon Musk, means British history for the past 20 years must be reassessed.

We have seen the biggest racially aggravated hate crime of the post-war years. And it was carried out against white girls, who were targeted because they were white. Nothing else comes close.

But what is the narrative we have been living with during this entire period, a narrative imposed on us from above? That only white people can be racist. That multiculturalism is an unalloyed good, that diversity is our greatest strength. That mass immigration is inevitable, valuable and should be encouraged, that we are nothing without it." (Peter Whittle).

 

Still quiet? Still looking away? The UK may well be dead already.

Simple courage is lacking, solidarity is lacking. The people have been atomised and divided, abandoning the public life of the nation for private pleasures pursued in the market. People are desperate.

Tommy Robinson, a man so dubious that even Nigel Farage won’t touch him, says Peter Hitchens. I have a lot of time for Peter Hitchens, who has been exposing the establishment his own way for decades.

“The strange worship of Yaxley-Lennon by law-abiding, civilised people reminds me of one of the great lines in English literature, in which it is said of Jemima Puddleduck (who is preparing a meal with a fox) that 'even the mention of sage and onion did not make her suspicious.” (Peter Hitchens).

 

“The strange castigation by the chatterati, whose tongues fall silent on his cause, is what baffles me.” (Leo Kearse).

 

“It’s snobbery, they know Tommy Robinson is telling the truth they simply don’t want to face it, too painful. There are plenty of Lefties on Twitter who think the Pakistani Rape Gangs are fabricated nonsense, they really don’t want to believe that it’s 10’s of thousands of victims.”

 

“Peter, the perennial handwringer in chief, quoting Beatrix Potter to patronise people who see through the polished veneer of your polite cowardice. You sit atop your moral perch, tutting at the unwashed masses daring to back someone like Tommy Robinson (let’s drop the faux intellectual “Yaxley-Lennon” nonsense, you’re not fooling anyone). What you don’t seem to grasp, Peter, is that people aren’t stupid, they’re desperate.

They see a country where their voices are silenced, where speaking out against grooming gangs, Islamic extremism, or even just bad governance gets them branded as “uncivilised.” They see institutions more concerned with pronouns and diversity quotas than justice. And when the establishment, yes, that includes you, dismisses them, mocks them, or worse, ignores them entirely, they turn to people who actually speak their language, however imperfectly.

Your Jemima Puddleduck analogy is quaint, but it’s not about blind trust or naivety. It’s about survival. These people feel like they’re the lambs, not the ducks, led to the slaughter by a state that’s betrayed them. So forgive them if they’re willing to sit down with the metaphorical “fox” to fight a bigger wolf.

Instead of sneering , Peter, why not try listening? You might learn something. But then again, that would require you to step off your pedestal.” (David Crabb).

 

Desperate? Where are the Left? It’s not just the state that has betrayed working class people. But maybe the Left, like the Greens, are part of the establishment.

 

Robinson’s methods, character, and motivations may be dubious – others can decide, I don’t know enough – but more dubious by far is the silent complicity he breaks.

 

Where are the rest of you? Why aren’t the people of impeccably good morals and character not standing up and speaking out?

 

“It’s about institutional failure, that’s what the enquiry needs to be about. As well as the victims, who deserve justice.” (Sharron Davies).

 

That’s precisely why the establishment will do everything to prevent a national enquiry into the entire issue. That’s why there was never justice for the Hillsborough victims.

 

“The important questions that need to be answered are about institutional failure. Why did police and social workers fail to act on complaints from victims and families? Are they still in positions of authority? What measures need to be in place to prevent repetition?” (Joan Smith).

“The fact that ‘The New Yorker’ have constructed a whole article questioning why someone is trying to expose grooming gangs and why someone is trying to bring justice to those young girls, explains how mentally sick mainstream journalism has got” (Sunil Sharma).

 

‘Can someone explain how arresting rapists who target white girls threatens “racial harmony” but targeting and raping white girls doesn’t?’

(Anne Marie Waters).

 

I would suggest that one reason is that the British are too passive and tolerant, and too ready to suffer indignity and humiliation, so the authorities side with the louder voice and stronger arm. It’s called mob rule, and it is the end of British society.

 

“We all know the names George Floyd and Stephen Lawrence. But everybody in this country should also know the names of Lucy Lowe, Charlene Downes, and Victoria Agogila – three white working class girls who were murdered by the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs.” (Matt Goodwin).

 

What now passes for the Left can’t get their head around this – they abandoned the working class and class struggle for a grievance hierarchy centred on oppressor and oppressed, and are unable to handle facts that contradict the narrative.

Miriam Cates refers to the “total dehumanisation of white girls.” We need to be more precise. This outrage has been made possible by the total dehumanisation of the white working class these past five decades. This is the end result of the class war waged from above against the working class – the destruction of working class communities and the dehumanisation and demoralisation of its members. Margaret Thatcher once described the miners as ‘the enemy within.’ She also engineered mass unemployment to break the back of the trade unions and disempower the forces of labour. It was a tactic employed just after the First World War, and led to depression, inflation, fascism, war. They care for nothing so long as they win the class war. Margaret Thatcher described mass unemployment as ‘a price worth paying,’ knowing fine well that it was not her and her class who was paying the price, whilst reaping all the benefit. That distribution of costs and benefits is still at work today. It’s the poor that gets the pain and the rich that gets the pleasure. Liberal utilitarianism in class society, alive and well in the luxury belief systems of the comfortably off.

 

“A father was arrested several times by South Yorkshire Police because he tried to rescue his daughter from a rape den.” (Charlie Peters on how grooming gang victims and their families were treated with contempt). You can read on the involvement of members of the social serves.

I can tell you all about how families of the Hillsborough victims were treated with contempt.

I and many others have told you. Were you even listening?

 

This is a major scandal and should cause national outrage. At its core, it touches on one of the most foundational social imperatives: a society’s ability to protect its young people from harm. Ignoring it any further is not just morally indefensible, it is unsustainable. No society can thrive on the basis of such weakness and cowardice. I would suggest that the fact that it has got this far indicates that your society is already dead, comprising cowards rather than citizens, soft and pliable in the hands of business and the state.

 

I’m a qualified clinician working in the NHS in one of the infamous northern Rape Gang towns.

Being a psychological service, we come into contact with victims of these gangs extremely frequently, and have done for decades. Their stories are truly horrifying.

Like most NHS services, the one I work for has a particular talent for running ‘awareness’ initiatives. Posters are put up, whole service emails are sent, presentations are given, meetings are had.

LGBTQ+ awareness, Black History Month, International Women’s Day, Refugee Week, Race Equality Week, Ramadan (used as a springboard for ‘Islam awareness’)… we have all of those and more. Every. Single. Year.

We also have one off initiatives that respond to current events. For example, in response to the death of George Floyd.

We even had emails sent around, and group meetings held, in response to the recent Southport murders, though these were exclusively about the ‘fear members of the BAME community must be feeling’.

Given the fact we work in an area swamped in the organised mass rape of young, vulnerable British girls, and that we routinely work with these girls, you’d expect an initiative to be created in response to this issues, wouldn’t you?

NOTHING. Absolutely nothing.

Not even a single email.

It is never spoken about. It is never addressed. And if someone does mention it in passing, they are looked at as if they are speaking Latin.

If nothing else, you’d expect there to be a clinical need for conversations to be taking place, you know, considering we provide care to many of the victims. But no. Apparently not.

We are woefully unprepared to work with these girls because no one’s willing to address the problem head on.

Maybe I’m stupid or have lost my mind. God knows it’s starting to feel like I have. I’m just utterly appalled at the lack of willingness on the part of professionals to pull their bloody heads out of the sand and face up to what’s laid before us.

Decades on and they still can’t seem to do it. Yet they wonder why faith in them, and a good majority of other public service, is collapsing.

Repulsive, wilful blindness.

If you read this, please RT it. People like myself have no other way to publicise such disgraces due to the institutional gagging of anyone and everyone who dares to challenge our respective establishments.”

(Humphrey Dinsmore)

They don't have any human qualities, feelings, or concerns, just fake narratives. Their power  and position is all they are bent on defending and extending . The power of evil.

It’s deliberately out in plain sight for those whose ‘interests’ it serves but seemingly innocuous to most casual ‘viewers’. It’s only when the blinkers fall off your eyes that you can see it all around you. Once seen it can’t be unseen; can’t put the genie back in the bottle.

 

Now it’s our duty to remove everyone else’s blinkers.

 

UK progressives hid horrific abuse – actively shut it away – for decades and decades. It is, therefore, ridiculously naive to think they will take any kind of responsibility for what they have done. While circumstances have changed, the response will remain the same (albeit heightened and more aggressive). Deflect, attack, gaslight. Repeat. For them, the perpetrators will always be the victims. If you think the denials and manoeuvres are part of a hastily cobbled together rearguard action, you’re absolutely mistaken. What makes me so sure? Well, a twenty-five-year stint in the university sector taught me one very rough lesson: the victims are as necessary to Project Diversity as the utopian vision itself. Put simply, the white working class is an enemy that must be destroyed. I don’t suggest that dominant intellectual/cultural groups are made up of sociopaths BTW; they’re not. But I do maintain that ideology has diminished them – on a human level, I mean. Which is bad enough. Far worse, in my opinion, is the fact that they are teaching our young people to grow up in their image. That’s how an identity-based education works. That’s why you are banished from the classroom if you don’t conform. It is the opposite of critical thinking. It’s a state-sanctioned cult. I’m delighted that the winds of change are blowing across the Atlantic. Thanks primarily to Elon Musk, we are now beginning to tackle woke head on. It’s about explaining to people, often in distressing detail, just what kind of devastation this stuff brings. They don’t know, you know. They really don’t know. Long may the awakening continue. (Dr. Philip Kiszely).

Wes Streeting says that your reaction to heinous crimes is worse than the heinous crimes.

This is called "reactive abuse" and its a widely recognised form of abuse.

 

Join the dots, make a picture, win a prize. In truth, you don’t need to – the picture is being waved right in front of your faces. Open your eyes, locate your backbone, find your voice.

"We have a Prime Minister that has deep connections and involvement within the highest possible echelons of the British judiciary, who is now the leader of a political party, with a clear history of either engaging in the sexual abuse of children, or covering up for child abusers, or actively refusing to investigate serious allegations of child abuse and those in our publicly funded institutions, meant to protect children. We have also see that same Judiciary, that the same party leader, was head of, actively and consistently, avoid adequately punishing child rapists, including high profile abusers like Savile, Edwards and Fayed. We also have a public funded media with deep and concerning connections to both, that have also engaged in and covered up for, prolific child abusers. All three have gone to great lengths to discredit and incarcerate, by any means necessary, anyone who speaks up and speaks out on these matters. It is impossible not to see that there is a much bigger and much more insidious network of bad actors running this country." (Nat, aka Queen Bob).

"Why were the rape-gang offences never deemed racially aggravated? Abusers called their victims 'white bitches' and 'white slags'. 'We are the supreme race, not these white bastards', one said in court. This is a race hate scandal." (Poppy Coburn).

"We cannot stop using accurate correct language because it might offend someone! No matter what this issue is. We cannot be told we cannot talk truth. This has been a massive issue with males in women & girls sport. The losers are always the victims." (Sharron Davies).

'They [the victims] have already had seven public inquiries!' Peter Kyle MP defends the Labour his party's decision to resist a public inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal. The Hillsborough campaigners were told this, too, with added abuse. We knew that the truth was being hidden and justice denied by these hobbled enquiries.

There have been inquiries which have within the broader subject of ALL Child Sexual Abuse, included the Rape Gangs, but NOT one specifically into the issue as a national problem

It’s not just the rapists that need prosecuting, it’s every single complicit individual who covered up the scale of the injustices against these young girls!

The Inquiries launched did NOT cover those complicit and they did not go back far enough to unearth ALL those complicit!

STOP trying to keep the injustice covered up and give the victims a National Inquiry.

Presenters need to make the single simple most important point that was not addressed by previous enquiries: the public wants to see public officials held responsible for the historic cover up - not promoted as some have been.

“Let’s cut the crap, shall we? The rape gang scandal is the greatest betrayal of British girls in modern history, and our spineless elites have turned a blind eye for years. Young girls ,our daughters, sisters, nieces were abused while authorities covered it up to avoid being called racist. Racist! Imagine that. Sacrificing the innocence of children on the altar of political correctness. It’s a national disgrace, an epidemic of cowardice dressed up as tolerance.

This isn’t about race, it’s about truth. The overwhelming majority of these predators came from a specific background. Pakistani Muslim men were allowed to prey on white working class girls because the establishment was too busy virtue signalling to call it what it is  systemic, targeted exploitation. Meanwhile, the councils adopt pathetic “Islamophobia” definitions to protect the feelings of communities harbouring these monsters. Feelings? What about the ruined lives of thousands of British girls? Where’s the outrage for them?

Elon Musk is right to call it out. Every decent person should be. We need a full national inquiry, mass deportations, and the jailing of those complicit in this cover-up. Britain deserves better than a system that protects the predators over the prey.” (David Crabb).

 

The premise that white people cannot be victims of racism lies at the heart of DEI. The engineered race wars leverage that as their cornerstone. The most vulnerable children in our society today face a woke and a racist left. Hence their apoplectic reaction to this advocacy.

 

There has never been a full compressive report into the child grooming cases. Labour know this and are hoping most people don't.

Three more survivors speak out here to BBC News about their abuse in Oldham.

What isn’t made clear here is that in the 2022 local enquiry set up by Mayor of GM, Andy Burnham, only ONE survivor’s voice was permitted to be heard by the review team. And it wasn’t any of these three survivors.

As I’ve said previously, unlike in The Augusta (Manchester) review 2020, and The Rochdale Review, 2024, I had not worked on any child abuse cases in Oldham whilst in GM police and therefore back then, had no way of contacting them, unlike in the other cases.

I was finally allowed to take the only only Oldham survivor I knew to speak to them and her account was consequently included. But that was the ONLY one.

And even more shocking was that Oldham Council had told the review team that under no circumstances must this survivor be approached for fear she may commit suicide if they did, which was a total lie.

Power in the hands of the wrong people is very dangerous, and I think this story shows how the voices of those who have a right to be heard have been silenced for many years.

And they are,finally, finding their voices, being heard, and fighting back…..

And all credit to them all! Xx. (Maggie Oliver).

The house of cards may be starting to fall down. As one who fought for, and failed to see, Justice for the 97 victims of Hillsborough, I truly hope there is a reckoning with the establishment, and all those who do the work of covering up.

I’m really relieved that other public figures are now beginning to expose the cover ups that I’ve seen for 20 years, as I believe that with the truth will come the change we so desperately need. (Maggie Oliver).

This is ‘the most heinous thing that's ever happened in our country, it's absolutely outrageous,’ says Marilyn Hawes, founder and CEO of Freedom from Abuse. She refers to how difficult it has been and still is to get any news channel to actually listen.’ She points to the massive reaction to Charlie Peters’ documentary, but notes that he only covered three towns, Rochdale, Rotherham, and Oldham. There are many more towns that we know of, more than fifty, and the thing that the authorities have sought to bury is still going on today.

What does it take for people to open their eyes? This is empirical reality up against ideology. Things decline and deteriorate and people keep looking away, voting for and supporting a failed politics.

There are too many ideologues, idiots, and cowards. You can forget the ideologues, they will carry on making any issue someone else’s fault, probably yours. Idiots may one day be sparked into tracing problems to source. The cowards are the more interesting bunch, in that they more than likely know the truth, but have a seemingly infinite capacity to screen it out. So long as an issue doesn’t affect them, they make no protest and take no action. That doesn’t augur well for the poor, the weak, and the vulnerable who are under assault in our society. If you want to know why so many people are homeless and why homelessness has been allowed to carry on for so long, look no further than the cowards. We have been deliberately thrown into a politics of survival, and those who are surviving do nothing to help those who are not, however much concern they will sometimes express.

This cowardice is covered by a ‘polite’ attitude from both officials and citizens, who really don’t want to talk about awkward issues in recognition of hard facts. It’s a polite cowardice in which brutal truths are hidden behind a polished and anodyne veneer.

A full reckoning on the ‘grooming’ gangs’ scandal (‘grooming,’ how’s that for a polished and anodyne veneer) is still a long way off, but the receipts are being kept and will make for very ugly reading when that time comes. And that time will indeed come – there are far too many receipts to be swept politely under the carpet.

What is officialdom hiding and hiding from? It is clear that the authorities don’t want to talk about the issue, let alone address it. And the most dangerous question of all is ‘why.’ What is the problem with these authorities?

 ‘They won't want that,’ says Marilyn Hawes, ‘because it’s not a can of worms, it’s a vat of worms, and they want to keep the lid on it.’ They ‘don’t even want to do the barest minimum, they don't want to do anything, they’d rather that everybody went away. But they’re not going to go away.’ Just as the establishment hope that the victims of the Post Office go away: “They’re waiting for more than just me to die… They would like to see us all just pop off like that.” (Betty Brown, a 92-year-old former sub-postmaster, worries she will die before she receives compensation). Just as the establishment thought that the Hillsborough campaigners would just go away, but didn’t. Don't go away, never go away. And those who persist in looking away, turn up, put a shift in - your system of governance is rotten and is causing real harm.

We want to make it clear how heinous these crimes are.

‘I mean I would like to take each one of those pictures of those men who are doing time and put beside them the pictures of the seven the 8-year-old, the 10 year olds the 14y olds, that they have raped and that they have abused and then see if it even makes you more disgusted at what you're looking at there and what those men are responsible for.

When you see it all come together, sat there thinking this is harrowing, and if you can't see that we need an inquiry after this to name and shame, dig out those people who let this happen they are third party complicit to this crime, what sort of people turn their back away and sell their souls. How can any human being ignore the plight of these youngsters?

How do these young girls going to live normal lives, as a mother, as a wife, whatever? It really does affect your intimate relations; it affects those people for the rest of their lives. They have a life sentence; they can't appeal. They can't be ignored. There was one guy in Charlie Peters’s documentary where this man rocks up and says “oh I'll hand the girl back if you don't arrest me.” That's unacceptable.’

I am sure it is still a ‘racist thing,’ says Hawes, the sense that even raising the issue identifies you as a racist or associates you with racists. Why the concern with the rapes committed by this community and not that? The question is asked every time without fail in order to damn motivations here as racist. The response every time is that there is a cover up with respect to one community whilst the rest are pursued, arrested, tried, and convicted. That game of political ping-pong goes absolutely nowhere, because the ideologues never ever take the point – they are concerned only to drown the issue in accusations of racism. The lesson is clear, if you find yourself mired in an endless game, then change the game. I would call the bluff of the ideologues and up the ante: capital punishment for all involved in rape and paedophilia, without fear or favour, the lot, gone. We will then see who is concerned and unconcerned, and who is protecting who.

But ‘nobody wants to upset the apple cart,’ says Hawes. The apple cart, however, has been well and truly upset. ‘You've got to tell it like it is,’ says Hawes. ‘I saw a comment from Jacob Rees Mogg, who said people are more concerned about there being more value in the Muslim faith than somebody being a devout Christian, and he’s right. We're supposed to be a Christian country: oh no we’re not! We're supposed to be a civilized country: no we’re not! How can you possibly be civilized if you let this happen. It's still happening and the government is doing absolutely stuff all about it!’

And it's not just Labour it's the Tories. Hawes exposes the link with the gangs, County Line gangs. No one has tackled knife crime, which is nearly always related. The way these gangs work is like the Russian doll effect, the little Russian doll who controls it all being hidden away somewhere. The obvious person is the one on the streets. How these gangs work is the same. ‘The person at the top is probably creaming in £110,000 a day cash sends out to the youngest in the gang, says this person's been a little bit disloyal, hasn't enough money, in you got to kill them now: if you don't do that you yourself are going to get killed. These are brutal murderous games.’

The corruption runs deep and is eating away the social and moral fabric of society.

‘I pray that you don't let this drop off.’

 

These children were let down by the authorities, by the police, by teachers, by social workers, and by many more. Where is the rest of society? Why didn’t you notice? The scandal was brought to public attention. Why did you pretend not to notice? Or suggest it’s another kind of problem (getting round to blaming the victim. This is a scandal on a massive scale.

There was a semi investigation called Operation Linden that was conducted by the office of police conduct. I quote: ‘Operation Linden is a wide-ranging and detailed series of investigations into how South Yorkshire Police responded to allegations of child sexual abuse in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. It is the second largest operation - after Hillsborough - we, or our predecessor, the IPCC, has ever carried out.’

The reference to Hillsborough is not encouraging. The investigators for Operation Linden were told not to probe senior officers. They went on to discover that cops did not lodge crime records even when rapes and sexual assaults were reported, did not question older men discovered in the presence of drunk young, and viewed vulnerable children as troublesome problems rather than victims of serious crime. That was in 2022.

Operation Linden concluded that there were systematic failings at South Yorkshire police that enabled industrial scale abuse between 1997 and 2013.

You do surprise me.

This instruction not to investigate senior officers sets the alarm bells ringing from the off.

Here is former Chief Inspector at the Met, Mike Neville: ‘it’s about the establishments protecting each other, because all the members of the senior police officers are members of the same establishment. They sign up to the same liberal left agenda. And it’s not really about systematic failings. What I would suggest is that over the last two decades people have been terrified of being accused of being a racist and how it will impact their career.

‘I'll give you an example even some 20 years ago, the Superintendent at Brixton I was with we produced a document on who was committing Street robberies. When she saw it was described as young black men she ripped out the page. So here you have the same in Rotherham, Telford, in places like that, Oldham, where senior officers know that the next rank up they're never going to get it, so they put getting the next pip or crown on their shoulder before helping young girls who are being raped, abused, and even murdered.’

These senior officers turned a blind eye and therefore enabled this scourge of rape gangs.

It has been established that there have been systematic failures at South Yorkshire police. South Yorkshire of course takes in Rotherham, where there were 1400 victims at least. This industrial scale abuse was going on from 1997 to 2013.

Senior police as well as teachers, social workers, councillors, and politicians thought it was worse for them to be accused of racism or Islamophobia than it was for tens of thousands of vulnerable white girls to raped by paedophile sexual predators - they thought it would be worse for them to be called racist than to bring these rapists to justice.

Mike Neville again: ‘the entire West has been corrupted.’ ‘I was over in Cologne in 2015 when the mass sex attacks on New Year's Eve by immigrants on the German women there. The police president tried to cover it up for three days before it all burst out and he got the sack. We see the same in Sweden where they've been trying to cover up these things. So this thing is not just a UK thing, this is a Western World thing where they've tried to enforce this doctrine of multiculturalism. If anybody disagrees with it, if anybody finds a flaw with it, like here we’ve got these gangs grooming, murdering, and abusing young girls, they are happier to cover that up than to let their doctrine be interfered with. It’s an absolute disgrace and we’re lucky now that we can talk about this because 10 or 20 years ago you would have been immediately denounced as a racist and that's like you're witch you put onto the pyre and set fire to. At least now with the interventions of people like Elon Musk we are able to discuss this without being arrested and condemned as far right. This is such a scandal that it needs this inquiry so we can name names and people need to go to prison … They need to be named and shamed and locked up.

Starmer sought to dismiss the call for a national inquiry by saying that what the public wants is immediate action.

A good rule of thumb I’ve learned over the years is to see those who are most insistent on ‘action!’ as the most evasive with regard to politics and politics. The promise of ‘getting things done’ is alluring, dismissing the search for proper diagnosis as an idle pondering.

Not so, investigation and diagnosis is the key of effective action (just as I would relate the blinding ideology of multiculturalism and diversity to the global extension of the corporate form – the pathetic ‘left’ of today is serving as the agent of corporate power).

By action, Starmer means action on the Jay Report. The problem is that this report wasn’t into grooming gangs at all but into general child sexual abuse. Starmer will know this, so he and all those who take this line are knowingly attempting to divert and deflect. They are among the people who need to be investigated and rooted out.

I should know from Hillsborough that public inquiries drag on forever and achieve little. The Hillsborough Campaigners spent decades establishing truth but were still denied justice. The complicity of the establishment in unlawful killing was exposed, but there was still no justice. That should tell you what you are up against.

An investigation tasked with finding all the police, local councillors, teachers, social workers, all those in authority who turned a blind eye should be identified and prosecuted. And they are so numerous that we are really talking of a root-and-branch transformation. That’s why there could never be justice for Hillsborough – too many were involved from the top throughout the layers below to be tried.

They didn’t just turned a blind eye, they stopped people investigating.

‘It’s an absolute scandal’ and ‘it is not just here, it'll be in France, in Belgium, in Germany, it's everywhere, and it's been allowed to happen because we've got this liberal elite in charge of us who were determined - just like they are determined with Net Zero and whatever else to push these things through, push multiculturalism through and be damned if it impacts on children or anybody else, and those of us who want justice, those of us who want these paedophile Pakistani Muslim paedophile rape gangs brought to heal, we're far right, we're racists.’ (Mike Neville).

‘These people are obsessed with an ideology and they'll push that ideology through whatever,’ says Neville. ‘This is the nature of the Left. They talk about the ‘far right’ but it is the far left that we need to worry about in this country, who do these crazy things.’ (Mike Neville).

Except that this ‘Far Left’ is not Left at all – they use ‘social justice’ as an ideological cover for serving and securing the material interests of some over against others and have not merely abandoned the working class but openly act against ‘ordinary’ people – all who are not on board or are not bought off. They are working to extend and entrench the corporate form – wittingly or otherwise - which is why you can find them in every major institution.

The problem, in other words, is not ideological – multiculturalism, racism – but structural. And you need to target and uproot that, as a condition of institutional and ideological transformation. To accusations of ‘racism’ and ‘far right,’ the response back is not ‘far left’ but ‘stooges of corporate power.’

‘A price worth paying’ is how Margaret Thatcher described the mass unemployment engineered by her and her government in the 1980s. It is the great and the good who set the price, and the working class who are made to pay it.

‘Are we honestly prepared to hold up white working class girls as sacrificial lambs to protect diversity?’ (Sam Armstrong).

‘That’s literally what has been done in this country for twenty years. That was the price that had to be paid, according to the good and the great who are in charge.’ (Julia Hartley-Brewer).

 

This whole story is the story of the working class this past half century. Industries wiped out, jobs lost, communities unravalled, traditions and cultures erased, families broken up, men written off and left to flounder, ‘deaths of despair,’ hopelessness, abuse from middle class liberals. The ‘price worth paying’ amounts to the elimination of the working class. It serves those who benefit materially from such a thing to label those paying the price as ‘far right,’ ‘the enemy within,’ ‘racist,’ their daughters ‘sluts’ and ‘slags,’ all deserving of their fate, a fate prescribed by the great and the good. It’s an absolute stain on the nation’s history, but it may not matter. A nation populated by people who allow and even justify such degradation won’t last long.

This is our new normal sanctioned by all European governments who refuse to police borders and actively encourage migration from dangerous  countries.

 

The greatest scandal in modern British history and people treat it like it is nothing or a ‘racist narrative.’ And so it carried on for so long, victims be damned, and so it continues. It is one of those stories that is in head-on collision with the dominant ideology of the age, multiculturalism, and the idea that ‘diversity is our strength.’ The Leftists who have bought into this are deluded fools (insofar as their Leftism is genuine). A capital system whose new regime of accumulation proceeds under the global corporate form was always going to undermine borders, uproot people and places, erode national sovereigny, and merge identities into an indistinct morasse. The end result is a wipeout. Liberals, leftists, greens, progressives cheer it on and think they are winning – they are no more than battering rams aimed against the remnants of moral, social, and historical roots. All will be rendered tumbleweed, blown hither and thither by corporate force. The clever people are tools and fools, apologists and rationalisers. They are useful for purposes of destruction, but utterly incapable of engaging in the work of reconstruction.

 

There are downsides to diversity that the ideologues don’t want to admit, let alone address. So the authorities just evade it and ignore it and hope, in the words of Labour MP Naz Shar, that the ‘abused [raped] girls of Rotherham and elsewhere should shut up for the sake of diversity.’ She said the quiet bit out loud – the authorities enable much, do nothing about the harm inflicted, and hope the victims will just know and accept their place and crawl away. That there has not been mass protest and outrage at this indicates just how small, cowardly, and pathetic this country has become. People are beaten, passive, and weak, quick to look elsewhere, hoping for external savious, if they have any hope at all.

These girls should have been listened to and their complaints should have been acted on. That they were heard and ignored indicates just how weak and spineless too many people are.

 

The issue of double-standards has been raised often. I have seen two broad responses to this claim: 1) flat denial that there are double-standards 2) the assertion that there have always been double-standards.

As a Hillsborough survivor I learned that in a society in which truth and justice reduce to power there are no standards at all: justice and truth are the interests of the strongest. With the reduction to power there is duplicity and hierarchy – justice for some, injustice for others. That we continue to refer to truth and justice indicates the existence of transcendent standards by which to judge existing institutions, laws, and practices.

 

Philosophical fineries aside, we can go straight to the jugular on this:

“If anyone doubts that there is a double standard in modern Britain as in many other Western liberal democracies these days you just need to ask one question: what would have happened if it had have been the other way round, what would have been the the result if gangs of white working class men had been singling out underage Muslim Pakistani girls and gang raping them? Would we have passed it over? Would we have said that's a bit too awkward to talk about? Would the police have just allowed it? Would the local councils have allowed it? Would the the Pakistani community in Britain have allowed it? The answer to all of these things is of course not! You just need to turn it the other way around and you see the two-tier system in Britain at the moment as in so many countries. Because we cannot cope with the situation that generations of politicians have handed us.” (Douglas Murray).

 

It has been decades of consistent political failure, from one government to the next, problems being postponed, reproduced, and intensified by way of false solutions. In the end, the nation pays a price that certain of its citizens have been made to pay from the first and ever after. How interesting to see the supposed Left, politically defeated in the 1980s, join the other side. Looking at the state of the nation now, I wonder how many will go back to Margaret Thatcher and see her neoliberalism, and see how it led into marketisation, globalisation, and corporatisation, and consider it ‘a price worth paying.’ It pays some people very well indeed.

“The old Labour Party, the one that stood shoulder to shoulder with the working man, that fought for coal miners and dockers, that carried the hopes of factory workers and steelmakers no longer exists. It’s gone, vanished into the fog of identity politics and middle class snobbery, replaced by a party that sneers at the very people it was built to represent.

 

Labour used to fight for bread and butter issues: decent wages, fair housing, strong communities. Today? They’re obsessed with pronouns, statues, and fringe causes that alienate the ordinary voter. Working class Brits don’t care about virtue signalling or tokenism; they care about putting food on the table and keeping their kids safe. Labour doesn’t just ignore that they actively despise it.

 

And let’s not forget, this transformation didn’t happen overnight. It started decades ago, when the party swapped its union roots for champagne socialism, when the red flag was replaced by rainbow flags, and when the struggles of ordinary Brits were traded for the grievances of loud, activist minorities.

 

The Labour Party isn’t the voice of the working class anymore, it’s the megaphone of the metropolitan elite. A party of Islington dinner parties and university seminars, utterly disconnected from the grit and graft of real life.

 

The old Labour Party died because it stopped listening to its own people. And the tragedy? It doesn’t even realise it. The working class has moved on, and Labour is left talking to itself in a language no one understands.” (David Crabb).

 

And the old Labour didn’t stand shoulder-to-shoulder with coal miners etc, but sought to canalise working class interests into sterile channels of incremental reforms, conditional upon the vicissitudes of ‘the economy,’ as against transformation beyond class division.

 

“Reform is now the most popular party among the working-class. Why? Because British workers have been smashed to pieces by globalisation, mass uncontrolled immigration, broken borders, Net Zero and an elite class that does not have to live with the consequences of its decisions.” (David Crabb).

 

“This is the reckoning the establishment didn’t see coming, and they’ve only got themselves to blame. Reform is surging because the working class has had enough of being treated like second class citizens in their own bloody country. They’ve been lied to, ignored, and systematically dismantled by a smug, self serving elite who live untouched by the chaos they unleash.

 

Globalisation? It hollowed out our industries and shipped good jobs overseas, leaving British workers to pick up the scraps. Mass immigration? Uncontrolled, unsustainable, and dumped on communities that are already struggling. Broken borders? They’ve turned the Channel into a conveyor belt for illegal crossings while British taxpayers foot the bill. Net Zero? Another elitist vanity project that punishes the working man while the champagne socialists swan around in their Teslas.

 

And the political class? Useless. Tories, Labour, Lib Dems it doesn’t matter. They’re all cut from the same cloth: out of touch, self-righteous, and utterly disconnected from reality.

 

“Reform isn’t popular because people suddenly love politics, it’s popular because it’s the middle finger to a system that’s sold them out. This isn’t just a movement; it’s a rebellion. The British worker is waking up, and the elites should be terrified. They’ve pushed too far for too long, and now the tide’s turning. Britain’s backbone is ready to fight back.” (David Crabb).

 

I would prefer a social transformation based on proper diagnosis to rebellion out of desperation.

 

“Successive governments have betrayed the British people. We can’t rely on the government. We need to start organising ourselves to at least ameliorate certain injustices against our own people.” (Emma Webb).

 

Emma Webb is a conservative. I have been saying this as a socialist my entire life.

 

David Crabb writes this:

 

‘The erosion of family values and tradition is the quiet tragedy of our age, a slow, insidious decay that’s ripped the heart out of our communities and left a hollow shell in its place. Once upon a time, family was the bedrock of society, the foundation upon which we built strong, resilient nations. Now, it’s under relentless attack from progressives, woke ideologues, and a culture that glorifies selfishness over sacrifice.

Marriage? Dismissed as outdated. Parenthood? Undermined at every turn. Fathers are reduced to optional extras, and mothers are told their value lies not in nurturing their children but in chasing corporate ladders. Tradition, the glue that held us together, is mocked as backwards, even oppressive.

 

But let’s not kid ourselves, this isn’t progress; it’s chaos. When the family collapses, communities crumble. Crime rises, mental health plummets, and children grow up lost, desperate for the stability that only a strong home can provide. We’re not raising citizens; we’re raising the casualties of a broken system.

 

The elites and the woke mob will tell you this is liberation, that shredding tradition frees us. But what they won’t admit is this: without family, without the values that bind us, we’re just aimless individuals, easier to manipulate, easier to control.

 

It’s time to fight back, to reclaim what’s been stolen. Strong families make strong nations. Let’s build them again.

 

Last week, I posted about the women of the Anglosphere, bold, resilient, and the backbone of our crumbling civilisation. But now, it’s time to address the men. Where are you? What happened to the proud, steadfast men who built empires, fought wars, and stood as pillars of their communities?

 

The men of the Anglosphere used to embody strength, duty, and honour. From the trenches of the Somme to the shipyards of Glasgow, they carried the weight of nations on their shoulders. Now, too many have been reduced to shadows, emasculated, belittled, and told they’re a “problem” simply for existing.

Let’s be honest, lads. We’ve allowed this. We’ve sat back while masculinity was demonised, tradition was mocked, and strength was rebranded as “toxic.” We traded grit for convenience, leadership for compliance, and purpose for passivity.

The world still needs strong men. Our families need us. Our communities need us. The Anglosphere needs us to remember who we are. Not as aggressors or oppressors, but as protectors, builders, and leaders.

It’s time to rise. Reject the narrative that men are the enemy. Embrace the values that made us great: courage, honour, and the unshakable belief that we exist to serve something bigger than ourselves.

The men of the Anglosphere once shaped the world. It’s time we remembered how. The future depends on it.’

The injustices in this country are many, continuing in new forms. Those who perpetrate them always have good reasons, reasons they agree with and which conform to their material interests. I want to expose people as possible, grab them by their contradictions and shake them until their illusions shatter. The injustices are so many, and go back so far, that more than a transformation, this country needs an exorcism. Long suppressed voices will be heard:

 

“And I knew then that I was beaten, that where there was no conscience there was no hope, there was nothing to be done. That this wickedness and this injustice was too great a monster for me to grapple with. I came home and closed my door, and since that day no one has bothered to open it to see who may be inside. I used to believe in God, but this is man’s world, I recognise it by the blood-stains. If God still sees us, he sees us with despair. Like Pilate he shakes his head and washes his hands, unable to save us… I have no forgivenes for the selfishness and greed which has destroyed my family. The hardest thing of my dying is to know that our murderers will go unpunished. Someone surely must pay for our unjust deaths and all the other deaths like ours, for I know that we are not unique. If no ear can ever hear my accusations, no eye ever read them, let my words burn themselves into the fabric of these walls so that the brickwork beams and plaster shall remember the agony and injustice of those dying under this roof. How can this ground ever be easy when there is no atonement for crimes like these. The soil is bitter with my children's blood I can say more. Justice cry against injustice from the dark centuries… Whilst we sleep in our paupers’ grave, someone somewhere remember.”

(The Exorcism, BBC, Dead of Night).

 

And the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer. And the voice of the poor is mediated by the voices of rich, and is abused, silenced, and suppressed when it doesn’t fit approved narratives. “How much longer are we prepared to let this situation continue?” Who is “We?”

Addendum 16th January 2025

“Wow! Looks like the Government is accepting my 5 point plan to prevent child abuse and expose cover-ups over Grooming gangs!” says Sarah Champion, at Yvette Cooper’s pathetic announcement that there will be local inquiries in just five towns. The rape gang scandal affected more than fifty towns. This must be the ‘limited’ inquiry Andy Burnham called for. It all begins to look somewhat coordinated, and thoroughly cynical, an attempt to deny truth and justice.

Champion is fooling only those who wanted to be fooled. The rest of us can see the attempt to have the very people we want held to account investigating themselves.

We can all see this is an attempt to have the very people we want held to account investigating themselves.

It's the fact that they are not even making much of an effort at fooling us that is even more worrying. It's all so crude and obvious that they must think they are untouchable and people really have no power over them.

‘We must have a national inquiry and we are not going to stop until we get one,’ says someone.

I don’t know who is worse here, the perpetrators or those who cover up. Sarah Champion utters the word ‘WOW’ as if everything we have asked for has been granted. It is so fake and phoney as to be abusive.

This is no better than anything that has gone before it.

We are not supposed to notice that she went from voting against a national inquiry to demanding a five point plan and that days later the government seem to adopt it.

It shows you what they think of the electorate.

They are taking the proverbial.

The Manchester Inquiry failed because it could not compel witnesses

Yvette Cooper is not giving any of these inquiries that power

Which is, at best, wilfully blind.

We already know the result of these inquiries – whitewash.

It’s time to turn our attention onto the whitewashers.

As with Hillsborough and countless other scandals, it’s one for the great public. If you keep allowing those who misgovern you thus to get away with it, things will continue to get worse.

Right, let’s not beat about the bush, this so-called “plan” from Yvette Cooper to tackle grooming gangs is a slap in the face to every victim who’s been failed by the system. Five inquiries? Five? What are they doing, cherry-picking which victims deserve justice? Where’s the national inquiry? Where’s the accountability? This is political theatre, not leadership. We’ve had years of hand wringing, years of people too scared to speak up because they might get called “racist.” Well, guess what? The truth doesn’t care about your feelings. These crimes were allowed to happen because of cowardice at every level, police, councils, politicians. They put political correctness above protecting our kids. They sold out our most vulnerable for the sake of their woke agenda. And now they’re trotting out Baroness Casey with her clipboards and committees, as if a three month audit will magically fix the rot in the system. Please! Where were these people when victims were being ignored, silenced, abandoned? They don’t care about justice; they care about headlines. Let me tell you what real leadership looks like. It’s ripping the problem out by the roots. It’s national inquiries, jail time for enablers, and laws that protect kids, not predators. It’s saying, “Enough is enough,” and meaning it. We’re the silent majority no longer. We’re the voice of justice, and we will not be silenced. Britain deserves better. Our children deserve better. And if the government won’t fix this, then by God, we will.